(of the curious type)
Mostly art + bits and pieces of my own work and thoughts
(of the curious type)
Ed Panar
Walking Home  
1999-2011 
ZoomInfo
likeafieldmouse:

Andrea Galvani
likeafieldmouse:

Andrea Galvani
likeafieldmouse:

Andrea Galvani
likeafieldmouse:

Andrea Galvani
likeafieldmouse:

Andrea Galvani
likeafieldmouse:

Andrea Galvani
ZoomInfo
solairebee:

By Nick van Woert
I’m interested in the evolution of materials in architecture and art, in terms of how the body is represented. If you look at it historically, you see a move from the monolithic materials of classical figures to the fake hollow plaster casts that we use to reproduce them today. It says something about how these days we’re interested in preserving the past, but only visually. There is no material continuity. The materials are more or less insignificant…For me, art is a material language first, and I think that we should look at the world with the same approach. What if we saw things, and thought about them in terms of how they were made rather than what they looked like? (Art in America Magazine’s Q&A with Nick van Woert)
solairebee:

By Nick van Woert
I’m interested in the evolution of materials in architecture and art, in terms of how the body is represented. If you look at it historically, you see a move from the monolithic materials of classical figures to the fake hollow plaster casts that we use to reproduce them today. It says something about how these days we’re interested in preserving the past, but only visually. There is no material continuity. The materials are more or less insignificant…For me, art is a material language first, and I think that we should look at the world with the same approach. What if we saw things, and thought about them in terms of how they were made rather than what they looked like? (Art in America Magazine’s Q&A with Nick van Woert)
solairebee:

By Nick van Woert
I’m interested in the evolution of materials in architecture and art, in terms of how the body is represented. If you look at it historically, you see a move from the monolithic materials of classical figures to the fake hollow plaster casts that we use to reproduce them today. It says something about how these days we’re interested in preserving the past, but only visually. There is no material continuity. The materials are more or less insignificant…For me, art is a material language first, and I think that we should look at the world with the same approach. What if we saw things, and thought about them in terms of how they were made rather than what they looked like? (Art in America Magazine’s Q&A with Nick van Woert)
solairebee:

By Nick van Woert
I’m interested in the evolution of materials in architecture and art, in terms of how the body is represented. If you look at it historically, you see a move from the monolithic materials of classical figures to the fake hollow plaster casts that we use to reproduce them today. It says something about how these days we’re interested in preserving the past, but only visually. There is no material continuity. The materials are more or less insignificant…For me, art is a material language first, and I think that we should look at the world with the same approach. What if we saw things, and thought about them in terms of how they were made rather than what they looked like? (Art in America Magazine’s Q&A with Nick van Woert)
solairebee:

By Nick van Woert
I’m interested in the evolution of materials in architecture and art, in terms of how the body is represented. If you look at it historically, you see a move from the monolithic materials of classical figures to the fake hollow plaster casts that we use to reproduce them today. It says something about how these days we’re interested in preserving the past, but only visually. There is no material continuity. The materials are more or less insignificant…For me, art is a material language first, and I think that we should look at the world with the same approach. What if we saw things, and thought about them in terms of how they were made rather than what they looked like? (Art in America Magazine’s Q&A with Nick van Woert)
solairebee:

By Nick van Woert
I’m interested in the evolution of materials in architecture and art, in terms of how the body is represented. If you look at it historically, you see a move from the monolithic materials of classical figures to the fake hollow plaster casts that we use to reproduce them today. It says something about how these days we’re interested in preserving the past, but only visually. There is no material continuity. The materials are more or less insignificant…For me, art is a material language first, and I think that we should look at the world with the same approach. What if we saw things, and thought about them in terms of how they were made rather than what they looked like? (Art in America Magazine’s Q&A with Nick van Woert)
ifthisisawoman:

B.Wurtz & Josh Tonsfeldtat Annaelle
Untitled, 2012
Wood, wire, thread, plastic, mesh, photograph
95x80x16cm
galleria-ari:

B. Wurtz, Untitled, 2012. Wood, wire, and plastic bags; 57 x 16 3/4 x 31 in.
Abraham Cruzvillegas
Autoconstruccións
HANS BREDER Body Sculpture 1972  Black and white photograph  7 x 7 inches
dejected:
Matthew Burns

“Ooh”
László Moholy-Nagy
“Study with pins and ribbons (Vivex process)”, 1937-38 color print, assembly 34.9 x 26.5 cm